September, 11 2011 : Daring to be free

8
2420

Ten years ago. Time flies. I remember the images, my reactions: shock, near denial. “It’s crazy, it can’t be!” A few days later Time magazine invited me to talk about the relationship between such violence and Islam. I remember having said, clearly: “As so many other observers, I have questions about the facts. But since Muslims were claiming to have acted in the name of my religion, I must take a stand and condemn these terrible terrorist attacks. Nothing can justify them; not only are they non-Islamic, they are anti-Islamic.” At the time, I was still minimizing the potential impact of those attacks. I was not completely aware of either the magnitude or the potential exploitation of what would soon be called “Islamic terrorism” and the “War on Terror.” But it rapidly became clear that we were witnessing a turning point. The reaction of the American people was as noble as it was honorable. Despite the media coverage and the political confusion, 66% did not believe that the attacks represented Islam. Many hurried to help their Muslim neighbors and to protect the local mosque. It was an impressive display.

Then President George W. Bush gave American citizens, especially the Muslims, a choice. Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists. American citizens and Muslims were trapped, especially when a few weeks later they had to support the invasion of Afghanistan as a legitimate response to 9/11. The true relationship between the innocent Afghans who were going to die and Usama Ben Laden was not clear. There was nevertheless no choice: either you are with us or with the terrorists was the motto.

I believed it was possible to be against both. The 9/11 attacks had to be clearly and firmly condemned, just as the war in Afghanistan—and more broadly the so called war on terror —was unjustifiable. But I had to face the reality: the world had changed.In the name of our own security we had to accept to be monitored, questioned and suspected. Our social and political rights, as well as our most basic human right—the presumption of innocence—were questioned; the greater the violence, the more draconian the security policy.

For ten years —with another “legitimate” additional war in Iraq—we have been witnessing growing fear, suspicion, and stigmatization. Mainstream Muslim, in the West as well as in the Muslim majority countries, became more and more vocal and proactive. Not only did they condemn was happened but also attempted to explain the true nature of Islam. Conferences, symposia and lectures were organized around the world to cleanse Islam of such behavior. Ten years later have we succeeded? The situation and the figures are cause for concern: the great majority of the Western population have a very negative image of not only extremists but of Islam and of ordinary practicing Muslims. 72% of Americans now think that Islam and the Muslim are a problem in the United States.

In the Muslim majority countries, the situation is the same. Tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of innocent people have been killed by terrorist attacks themselves or have paid the price of the so-called war on terror as justified retaliation. The consequences of 9/11—beyond Afghanistan and Iraq—are huge. Muslims must prove they are “moderate;” they are seen as permanently suspect, both in their way of life and when they travel. We have heard time and time again: “Not all Muslims are terrorists but it so happens that all terrorists are Muslims”—a slogan that has justified the mainly negative media coverage of Islam and the discriminatory treatment of Muslims.

Usama Ben Laden has been killed, we are told. A page of a sinister book has been turned; it’s time to move on. The Arab uprisings have proved that massive non-violent protest can shake the dictators’ thrones. One can feel a new energy even nothing is clear and the future still uncertain. It might be, however, that the most important liberation for the Muslims will be intellectual and psychological.

It is time for them to stop being defensive and apologetic about their faith and values. The war on Muslim minds has had a damaging effect and, on the long run, might prove more dangerous than the war on terror. For millions of Muslims, it is essential to resist becoming alienated, frightened, uncertain and lacking self-confidence. Not to live in the eyes of others’ judgments, but by the meaning of one’s own dignity. It might be that 9/11 is teaching us the most important of all Islamic spiritual teachings: intellectual and psychological liberation are the two conditions of freedom. Through their spiritual, intellectual and social struggles Muslims should dare to be free. For freedom has a price they must be prepared to pay.

8 Commentaires

  1. Assalamu Alikum

    Thank you for a great article.Islam is such a strong ideology that we don’t need to be defensive and apologetic about our faith and values.

  2. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    May Allaah help you in your career, we must be free. (We are free to our religion), but we do not need any Western country that gives us the freedom (as they claim). We are aware of all the awareness of the existence of the hidden world government, are behind all the events.

    لا إلاه إلا الله محمد رسول الله

    • Western governments give us freedom in western countries, where much of us are living. So we can dare to be free in our way, taking our rights, enlarging our comprehesion, carying our values, acting as citizens.

      Je ne sais d’où vous écrivez, mais je suis fatiguée des discours anti-occidentaux de musulmans qui sont au coeur de l’occident. Prouvons que l’islam appartient aussi à l’occident.

      Ce n’est pas parce que le discours sur la démocratie est honteusement instrumentalisée par les gouvernements qui conduisent des politiques impériales que nous devons “jeter le bébé avec l’eau du bain”! Prenons les espaces de liberté qui nous sont offerts. Quant à la libération des esprits, c’est à chacun de faire le travail.

      F

    • I think we really should reconsider our obsession with the so called “hidden government” , not because it is completely or 100% false, but rather because i think we ended up in a really over-exaggerated paranoia that cannot help us understand correctly the reality we are living .

  3. If only , our government can read this one … I know they will but they will just ignore it . Mr Ramadan , you are such an inspiration to me and a pride to us . By US , I mean the WorldPeace believers . I am an American citizen , 16 year old girl and I’m NOT proud of how cruel my country , the greatest country , act against innocents muslims around the world . I had some tears dropping while readin’ these lines . I lost my uncle in 9/11 and to be faithfull I hated muslims so bad that I bullied one of my class mate muslim …Until , I see one of your interview on CNN . I can’t thank you enough Professor . Love . Peace .

  4. A great article, I am totally agreed with you Dr Ramadan.
    We should developp our intellectual and psychological mind in order to be free, and dare to express our views.

  5. Hommage aux morts du 11 septembre. Mais c’est quand alors que nous renderons hommage aux millions d’Irakiens tués? aux civils qui n’ont rien fait?
    Quand renderons nous hommage aux afghans morts pour rien, par faute de l’Otan, par intérêt américain?. Quand donnerons nous nos condoléances à toute la Palestine, cette terre violée, ce peuple poursuivi pour vouloir garder sa terre. Quand viendra ce jour où les crimes de guerre seront punient? Georges Bush parait-il a tué le triple des morts du 11 septembre ,en Irak, loin des grattes-ciel! Il a aussi soutenu la violence, en soutenant toujours le gouvernement Israélien. Il a envahi des terres pour ses propres intérêts, le pétrol à droite, l’opium à gauche et la liste est encore longue. Il est solidair de rendre hommage mais il est égoiste de le faire pour une partie et de laisser l’autre. C’est à l’Occident, aux gouverneurs occidentaux que je m’adresse. Au nom de quoi les morts de la rive Nord, sont plus hommageux que ceux de la rive Sud. Au nom de quoi,le 11 septembre est devenu commémoration international et au nom de quoi le 20 mars 2003 est toujours resté seulement dans les archives sans franchir un seuil. Au nom de quel raison êtes vous, gouverneurs de l’occident entrain de raisonner. On se dit mon Dieu démocrate, pour la liberté, l’égalité et la fraternité, mais où sont passés ces valeurs? Pourquoi les appliquer pour certains et laisser l’autre? Est-ce cela la fraternité? Est-ce cela légalité? Il semblerai que c’est l’hypocrésie, l’inhumanité.Hommage aux morts du 11 septembre et honte aux gouverneurs de l’occident.

  6. salamo alaikom
    Prophet Muhammad said: “There will come a time when the world will meet to plan the destruction of Islam, that’s what we see today in the Council of the United Nations in the boardroom .
    Among the biggest fear for them is the unity of Islam and Muslims. the Freemason West worked for the split and the collapse of the Islamic world .. even the Arabic language (language of the Quran), being marginalized and become a secondary language, the greatest danger that threatens them is the unity of Islam and Muslims .. but the final victory of Islam and Muslims,…We are free to our religion (ISLAM)

LAISSER UN COMMENTAIRE

S'il vous plaît entrez votre commentaire!
S'il vous plaît entrez votre nom ici